Should George Zimmerman Be Charged For Killing 15-Year-Old Trayvon Martin?

The Philosophy of Security

This is a case that needs to be studied in depth, regardless of the final verdict,   There are a number of issues here that could have a huge impact on all our safety in the future. 

Issues like should a citizens watch person be armed, this is a huge subject of what rights convey.  Many areas, or firms hire off duty police officers, and some do not allow them to be armed, while on duty.  Having a permit to carry a weapon for a citizen, and then using it to arm themselves during a citizens watch patrol, is something we need to address.  As cities and other jurisdictions try and save money by cutting back on police, things like a citizens watch program become more important.  But carrying a weapon with minimal training to protect yourself, and carrying a weapon in furtherance of duties like a citizens watch, are far different. 

For instance a carry ability in Fla for your personal weapon does not allow you to carry a weapon as a professional bodyguard, or even a guard.  Both require much more training, less than police officers get, but far more than a civilian carrying a weapon for personal protection.  Making the decision to use a weapon is one of the toughest things for a police officer, let alone a citizen watch.  Which is part of the training you need, pulling a weapon of any type can have huge influences on the psychological well being of both the person pulling the weapon as well as the  person having a weapon pointed at them.  Both can act in very (for them) uncharacteristic ways.  That often lead to over reactions on both sides.

Other issues, are the protection of a civilian watch person, it is a real concern, but I think most police and judicial folks would rather they observe and report, rather than putting themselves in actual conflict.  For most people, and many will argue even police, a weapon tends to convey a feeling of power and control that makes for decisions that can lead to to incidents like these.  The word defense takes on very different meanings when you are  in a defensive posture, than when you are actively moving toward a person.

I think the stand your ground law is fine for self protection, but not for a civilian acting under any color of law.

I would like to hear others comments, not of the actual case as much as the over reaching issues.


Views: 152

Tags: Defense, Life, of


You need to be a member of Peace and Collaborative Development Network to add comments!

Join Peace and Collaborative Development Network

Sponsored Link

Please Pay What You Can to Support PCDN

Please consider Paying What You Can to help PCDN grow. We encourage you to consider any amount from $1 and up. Read the SUPPORT page prior to making a payment to see PCDN's impact and how your payment will help.

Sponsored Link

Translate This Page


PCDN Guidelines and Share Pages

By using this site you're agreeing to the terms of use as outlined in the community guidelines (in particular PCDN is an open network indexed by Google and users should review the privacy options). Please note individual requests for funding or jobs are NOT permitted on the network.

Click BELOW to share site resources Bookmark and Share
or Share on LINKEDIN




© 2016   Created by Craig Zelizer.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service