Kyoto, Japan
December 17, 2009
Dear World Press Photo people
It goes without saying that
your exhibition this year too was marvellous. That more than 5.000 photographers of 124 nationalities submitted almost 100.000 images testifies to the intensity with which images, not only text, contribute to our awareness, knowledge and compassion for the world.
The proposal I want to put forward here is exclusively constructive. As a peace researcher/worker - at the moment visiting professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto (I saw you exhibition in the university's World Peace Museum) - I am certainly able to understand that the economic and political wars, natural catastrophes, the human suffering and the refugees and homeless people are part of our reality, the world's reality. No discussion whether it should be covered, or not. That explains, I assume, why the great majority of the images selected for the exhibition, depict violence one way or the other.
However, is there something else that could also describe our global situation? Is there something that would resemble the practise and theory of peace journalism, pioneered by peace researcher Johan Galtung and eminent media people-cum-researcher like Jake Lynch and Annabel McGoldrick in their textbook, Peace Journalism?
Could one imagine that there would also be a category in your 2010 exhibition that would stimulate photographers around the world to cover themes such as peace, nonviolence, reconciliation, tolerance and forgiveness?
Although I am half-ways a photogrpaher myself, trying to combine international peace work with my amateur interest in images and graphic art -
www.obergphotographics.com - I am not sure whether there is anything that can be called peace photography. I know it is not the boring, static sun-set or over-romanticised images of holding hands or showing the peace signs at demos, etc.
It is, if anything, deeply significant everyday events, small signs in the corners, calm and harmony, play and conviviality - not "rest in peace" of the graveyards, for sure!
On the other hand, I ask myself - and in a way you too: Why should there not be something called peace photography? Why should violence and suffering be so much more easy to find and shoot than the beauty of what human beings can also do to each other, including forgive and reconciliate?
So, my proposal is that World Press Photo 2010 would announce in advance that there is a new category, or theme, that people can also submit to - peace and reconciliation photography, or something like that. And let's see what is submitted to that category - it could be that that is what one would define as peace photography?
Since peace and reconciliation and nonviolent struggle do take place in societies everywhere - I myself have worked with young Hutus and Tutsis in Burundi and all the sides in the ex-Yugoslav space - it must also be possible to shoot images of it. But perhaps we don't see it when it happens?
Perhaps we are blinded by the general mainstream media tendency to convey stories of bloodshed, tragedy and utter violence - in short "bad" news. But does that cover the whole reality? Does it in any way encourage people to take action for a better future for all? I think the answer is that it does not!
I'd be happy to hear your spontaneous reaction to my proposal.
And thanks for your attention - and for giving us so many strong, memorable image experiences!
Kind regards
Jan Oberg, PhD
Professor Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto
Director of TFF - Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, Lund, Sweden.
You need to be a member of Peace and Collaborative Development Network to add comments!
Join Peace and Collaborative Development Network