Many people will choose at some point in their lives to volunteer. Volunteer opportunities range from spending an afternoon at a local soup kitchen, working for a week at an orphanage in one’s home country or abroad, or serving for two years with the Peace Corps. Volunteer opportunities abound, giving participants the opportunity to tackle social issues by serving affected populations. Yet, just as PCDN’s “Guide to Short Term Travel Learning Opportunities in Conflict Regions,” points out, there is potential for negative impacts. In some cases, a volunteer’s presence can do more harm than good.
Three commonly cited ethical concerns of volunteering are: (1) attitudes of volunteers; (2) issues related to money; and (3) misunderstanding of the social problem and its complexities. While most volunteers have an interest in helping others and may be sympathetic or even empathetic towards the receiving population, their service can at the same time be viewed as condescending. Volunteers (if they come from outside the community) may also be stereotyped as being wealthy, which can lead to expectations from the receiving population that volunteers make financial contributions. Finally, volunteers may misunderstand the situation in which they choose to volunteer, including making assumptions about the population they are serving and the underlying reasons of the social situation. How can one address these ethical concerns? By going beyond volunteering, to “service-learning.”
Service-learning is the practice of integrating pre-service education with meaningful community service, reflection, and post-service action. Service-learning allows “service-learners” to: (1) learn about the root causes of social issues; (2) engage in meaningful service that helps the community to meet its needs or goals; (3) develop the service-learners’ character as they reflect on their experience; and (4) share their experience with others. Service-learning can be done in one’s own community, through partnering educational communities with community organizations, and/or outside of one’s country or community.
Service-learning as a concept emerged in 1966 to describe a service project that linked students and faculty with organizations doing development work in tributary areas of East Tennessee. Shortly thereafter, the first service-learning conference convened in 1968. In the ‘70s and ‘80s, the “Synergist” journal was created, which promoted linking learning and service. A number of grassroots level service efforts surfaced, including Campus Compact, Campus Outreach Opportunity League, the National Association of Service and Conservation Corps, and Youth Service America. In the ‘90s, higher education and high school institutions began incorporating service-learning into their curriculum. And in 2001 the first international conference on service-learning was held, inciting a worldwide movement of service-learners.
So how does service-learning differ from volunteering? A volunteer is often well-intentioned, but may not be well-educated about social issues. A service-learner, on the other hand, is concerned with root causes of social problems and, ideally, through the process of service-learning, alters his/her values and subsequent life choices based on the experience he/she had. Service-learning can involve short-term trips or long-term trips. Regardless of the length of the trip, however, service-learners use pre- and post-service time to learn about the issues, reflect on their experience, and demonstrate what they have learned. The following steps can guide those who want to evolve from volunteer to service-learner. (However, do keep in mind that as a service-learner goes into the field and becomes immersed in the community context, things may change and some steps may not be feasible. It is important to remain flexible.)
Step 1: Identify a community need
Step one is the preliminary analysis that investigates and identifies a need in the community. This need can be identified by creating surveys, conducting interviews, reading or listening to the news, or from personal experiences. Most importantly, don’t assume that you know what the community needs. Always consult people in the community when identifying their needs.
Step 2: Research, prepare, and train
Step two centers on pre-service education and preparation.
Step 3: Reflect
In step three, the service-learner will reflect on the knowledge gained/ skills learned from step two. This reflection can include answering questions such as:
Step 4: Serve
Step four is the actual act of serving a community. Service can vary in duration, from short-term to long-term, and in location, from local to international. It can also take a number of forms:
Step 5: Reflect
In step five, the service-learner will reflect on his/her service activity.
Step 6: Demonstrate
In step 6, service-learners will demonstrate to others what they learned throughout the service-learning experience. This may include:
This can take place in everyday conversation, by holding a conference, posting photos from the service experience, starting a blog on PCDN or other sites, communicating on social media, etc.
Step 7: Continue/Commit
In step 7, the service-learner never stops being a service-learner! He/she will alter his/her values and subsequent life choices based on the experience he/she had. Service-learners will continue to engage in the issues they learned about and/or tackle new community needs.
Interested in joining a service-learning group or starting your own service-learning activity?
The following is a list of some key organizations that organize service-learning activities for youth and/or adults. It would be very difficult to post a complete list of all the organizations or opportunities available for those interested in service-learning, so this list is intended as a starting point. Please feel free to add your own suggestions.
To read further about service-learning, please see the following:
America, Youth Service. "Semester of Service Strategy Guide." http://www.ysa.org/resources.
Away, Break. "Break Away Manuals." http://www.alternativebreaks2012.org/resources/manuals/.
Billig, Shelley H., and Andrew Furco, eds. Service Learning through a Multidisciplinary Lens: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2002.
Bolton, Gillie. Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development Second ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2005.
Bowdon, Melody A., Shelley H. Billig, and Barbara A. Holland, eds. Scholarship for Sustaining Service-Learning and Civic Engagement: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2008.
Casey, Karen McKnight, Georgia Davidson, Shelley H. Billig, and Nicole C. Springer, eds. Advancing Knowledge in Service-Learning: Research to Transform the Field: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2006.
Clearinghouse, National Service-Learning. "Toolkits." http://www.servicelearning.org/toolkits.
Compact, Campus. "Educating Citizens - Building Communities." http://www.compact.org/.
Eyler, Janet, and Shelley H. Billig, eds. Deconstructing Service-Learning: Research Exploring Context, Participation, and Impacts: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2003.
Eyler, Janet, Dwight E. Giles Jr., and Angela Schmiede. A Practitioner's Guide to Reflection in Service-Learning: Student Voices & Reflections. Nashville: Vanderbilt University, 1996.
Furco, Andrew, and Shelley H. Billig, eds. New Perspectives in Service Learning: Research to Advance the Field: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2006.
Gelmon, Sherril B., and Shelley H. Billig, eds. From Passion to Objectivity: International and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Service-Learning Research: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2007.
Hatcher, Julie A., and Robert G. Bringle, eds. Understanding Service-Learning and Community Engagement: Crossing Boundaries through Research: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2012.
Moely, Barbara E., Shelley H. Billig, and Barbara A. Holland, eds. Creating Our Identities in Service-Learning and Community Engagement: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2009.
Network, The Corps. "Strengthening America through Service and Conservation." http://www.corpsnetwork.org/index.php.
Root, Susan, Jane Callahan, and Shelley H. Billig, eds. Improving Service-Learning Practice: Research on Models to Enhance Impacts: IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2005.
Schön, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action: Basic Books, 1984.
Service, Corporation for National and Community. http://www.learnandserve.gov/.
Comment
Comment by Rula Awwad-Rafferty on April 30, 2012 at 11:19am Thank you for the blog. I have hesitancy about sharply separating the act of volunteerism and service from "life-long" learning, but I do agree about the motivation, ethics and processes, as well as the co-learning and mutual discovery that occurs. Being mindful of the various modes and scopes of volunteering, intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, the philosophy of why one/group engages in volunteering and service, I'd add that Volunteering and service learning can certainly be built outside of the classroom. In my university for example, both offices of Volunteerism and social action & Service Learning co-exist, embracing a philosophy of doing and engaging, reflecting, and focusing on building capacity across many scales with empathy, foresight, collaborative intent, and cultural competency. Pre, mid, and post service reflections and skill building occurs. The ethics of engagement for the greater good, and collaborative thinking are necessary stage of development that we must re-engage.
Please consider Paying What You Can to help PCDN grow. We encourage you to consider any amount from $1 and up. Read the SUPPORT page prior to making a payment to see PCDN's impact and how your payment will help.
By using this site you're agreeing to the terms of use as outlined in the community guidelines (in particular PCDN is an open network indexed by Google and users should review the privacy options). Please note individual requests for funding or jobs are NOT permitted on the network.
Click BELOW to share site resources
or Share on LINKEDIN
FOLLOW PCDN on TWITTER, FACEBOOK or GOOGLE+
Celine Desbrosses liked Charlotte Booth's discussion Event: Great Lakes Policy Forum, Washington DC - Wednesday, May 29th -"Intervention Force and Stabilisation Plan in DRC: Compatible, or Counter-productive?" Johns Hopkins - SAIS 1740, Washington D.C.
Celine Desbrosses replied to Charlotte Booth's discussion Event: Great Lakes Policy Forum, Washington DC - Wednesday, May 29th -"Intervention Force and Stabilisation Plan in DRC: Compatible, or Counter-productive?" Johns Hopkins - SAIS 1740, Washington D.C.
osituyo oladapo liked Elizabeth Degi Mount's discussion Accounting and Social Media Intern, Center for the Study of Gender and Conflict© 2013 Created by Craig Zelizer.

You need to be a member of Peace and Collaborative Development Network to add comments!
Join Peace and Collaborative Development Network