How would you propose possible peace plan for Sudan and South Sudan?

Observers claimed that both Sudan and South Sudan should restrain from aggression and return to diplomatic negotiation. History has it that the two former foes had been at civil war for 39 years out of 56 years of independence, with only 16 years of intermittent peace, before South Sudan eventually decide to secede into a New Republic July 9th 2011. Eight months of independence in South Sudan tension is mounting again for full scale war, this time war against an independent nation on undemarcated border between the two sovereign states.

Many people would ask simple question about why the border was not demarcated before independence declaration? Well the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) that took three years to negotiate did provide protocols to address border issues, the status of Southern Blue Nile, Abyei and Nuba Mountains among others. Those protocols were not implemented as specified in the agreement. Who is to blame? Moreover, border demarcation is one of the many issues to be negotiated and resolve between the Sudan and South Sudan.

After South Sudan was declared independent last July 2011, Soldiers who participated in the Sudan civil war from Southern Blue Nile and Nuba Mountains, found themselves in the Sudan, with a one-time their enemy. The CPA protocols to address their grievances and concerns were ignored by Khartoum and they remain without choice but to continue with their struggle for Freedom, Equality and Justice, after many years of marginalization and representation. They went back into the bush to continue with arms struggle, and fighting along the border between Sudan and South Sudan, warranted Sudan to believe that the rebels were getting support from South Sudan government, who was once their friends. On the one hand, Sudan has recruited opposition from South Sudan and armed them to continue their struggle to topple the newly independent republic of South Sudan. Practically both sovereign states resort in helping each other’s rebels, instead of negotiating peaceful agreement. Khartoum responded to such activities by bombing South Sudan towns on pretext that it was pursuing its rebels. Several civilian were killed in a series of Bombs dropped by Khartoum.

Efforts by South Sudan to United Nation Security Council and international community to pressure Sudan to stop its bombing campaign in a sovereign country went to deaf ears, or without any reaction or solution. The African Union High Panel sponsoring mediation in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia to resolve the post independent issues, has been boycotted several times by Sudan, and just few days before South Sudan captured the town of Panthou (Heglig), Sudan walked out of the negotiation, and three hours later, they started bombing the towns in the republic of South Sudan by planes, believed by the South Sudan army to be launching their operation from their bases in Panthou (Heglig), the disputed territory, since there is no border, it is hard to conclude that Panthou (Heglig) is Sudan territory. But what we know is that the 1956 border between South and Northern Sudan lies 30 km North of Panthou or Aliiny  now known with its fake name Heglig that was given after the oil discovery 1980s.

Sudan has refused to agree on South Sudan oil transit fee, the international oil transit fee is $ 0.4 per barrel, south Sudan agreed to pay Sudan $ 1.00, but Sudan refused, demanding $ 32.00 per barrel. This is not negotiation by any logic. Secondly, Sudan has refused to sign the Abyei Border Commission (ABC) report, making the demarcation of the border impossible. Thirdly Sudan has rejected the court ruling on the Abyei territory. Fourthly Sudan has refused the Abyei referendum process to take place as stipulated in the CPA, living it in limbo, and its people are still languishing hopelessly. Fifthly, the nationality of people caught up in each other’s boundaries has not been resolved, the example are many, but to mention few for the readers. Sudan is not interested in peace and President Al Bashirshould not have an illusion that he will obtain peace through military means, if Sudan government did not militarily defeat the guerrillas during civil war for 39 years. South Sudan has no illusion either to win peace through military aggression, except in defense of its territory.

Border dispute is just one of the many unresolved cases; however, international community condemnation of South Sudan act of self-defense is not fair and therefore will not bring peace. The peace will not come if all the issues mentioned are not resolve, through negotiation, between Sudan and South Sudan. The end must justify the means, South Sudan has lost trust in Sudan and therefore, international community should intervene to stop the escalation of war by providing United Nations troops between the two countries in order to create room for confidence building prior to returning back to negotiation table. Otherwise, without the help of international community to pressure both countries to the negotiation table, there will be no peace between Sudan and South Sudan. How would you propose possible peace plan for Sudan and South Sudan? 

Views: 319


You need to be a member of Peace and Collaborative Development Network to add comments!

Join Peace and Collaborative Development Network

Comment by Francis Okeny Silvio on April 22, 2012 at 5:41pm

Thanks Libby, Len and James Osemene for your comments. The parameters cutting through Sudanese societies are diverse regarding its people and religion on the other hand. The beauty of Sudanese people is in their diversity which is essential part of any peace process.

We have 65% people of African origin and 35% people of Arab origin, from the British statistics. The 35% people of Arab origin declared Sudan as an Islamic state and imposed Islamic Shari'a law in the country, moreover hijacked the country to the Arab world. Why can 65% people of African origin can not also declare Sudan an African country. All the Sudanese cultures are what made the Sudan a country and therefore for one specific culture to claim Sudan as its own is wrong. As you can see, each group will resist the claim, and eventually that is why there had been no peace for 39 years out of 56 years of independence, that is why Sudan is now divided into two independent countries after 56 years of forced political marriage.

So many peace agreements were signed, but in principle, they did not work as most peace activists may think, making it even more complicated to compare Sudan situation with other countries that have no race diversity. For example, Nigeria do not have race diversity, and its conflict is purely base on religious difference, thus the peace plan that would work for Nigeria would not necessarily fit in Sudanese conflict situation, just to illustrate how different the situations are. In the Sudanese case, we have race, religion and cultural diversity making it more complex and difficult.

The civil war in Darfur, Nuba mountains and Southern Blue Nile is between Muslims, but between Arabs and black African race, to be more specific on my fundamental point on religion and race. The minority Arabs are in power since independence, oppressing, discriminating and marginalizing the black African majority, Muslims or non-Muslims. It is hard to pin down the Sudanese problem on just religion, and assume that any peace plan that works to resolve religious difference would also work for Sudanese people for that matter.

Comment by James Osemene on April 21, 2012 at 6:27am

Yes its true, "Dialogue in Nigeria" is interesting I received my own last month.

On Sudan imbroglio, I think actualising sustainable peace should start with the people. The much needed peace they desire is there with them. Let them put their ego aside and respect themselves, let them stop seeing one another as rivals, and realise they cant get all they believe is their ancestral gift if peace must come. Boundaries and resources dont fight, its humans that fight over resources and status.. The way forward is mutual respect and shaping of perceptions.

Comment by Libby and Len Traubman on April 20, 2012 at 2:08pm

PEACE is about People and about Relationships.  PROCESS is about Time.  CHANGE begins with People Relating face-to-face in small circles of Dialogue with it's new quality of listening-to-learn.  Government cannot move ahead of the people's culture, so the citizen process over time must be the entry-point of a sustainable peace as neighbors forever.  This is illustrated in real life by 200 brave African women and men in the new 2012 documentary film available cost-free on DVD -- DIALOGUE IN NIGERIA: Muslims & Christians Creating Their Future, described at

Sponsored Link

Please Pay What You Can to Support PCDN

Please consider Paying What You Can to help PCDN grow. We encourage you to consider any amount from $1 and up. Read the SUPPORT page prior to making a payment to see PCDN's impact and how your payment will help.

Sponsored Link

Translate This Page


PCDN Guidelines and Share Pages

By using this site you're agreeing to the terms of use as outlined in the community guidelines (in particular PCDN is an open network indexed by Google and users should review the privacy options). Please note individual requests for funding or jobs are NOT permitted on the network.

Click BELOW to share site resources Bookmark and Share
or Share on LINKEDIN




© 2016   Created by Craig Zelizer.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service