Peace and Collaborative Development Network
Building Bridges, Networks and Expertise Across Sectors
Started Jun. 5, 2009
Started Jun. 5, 2009
March 25, 2010 from 12pm to 1pm – Online
June 19, 2010 to July 17, 2010 – Johns Hopkins SAIS Bologna Center
July 18, 2010 to July 27, 2010 – Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
© 2010 Created by Craig Zelizer
Comment Wall (4 comments)
You need to be a member of Peace and Collaborative Development Network to add comments!
Join Peace and Collaborative Development Network
It is just very recent I created this account,I m law student in Ro,and I m intersted in Middle East politics,conflict resolution and gender issues.what about u?
Sorry to reply late, I was traveling...It is my pleasure too to be your friend on this field,
keep in touch
saideh
Pleased to receive your follow-up in building our network for international friendship with through mutual interest and goals. Logic dictates you also work in the field of medical and educational research, like myself. Rather fond of the old adage of 'without your health there is no wealth.'
Noticed you seem to be state side for research and development - perhaps during your stay our paths may be able to cross in like efforts. Yes, today Augsut 2nd, is a lovely moment to take a break for international friendship day. Combining efforts with those whom like ourselves share the backbone in our simple attempt to make a difference in taking care of business is always a pleasure and gift.
Sending best prayers for you, your family, friends, and associates for efforts to succeed in bringing to all one moment for peace. How may we have more, when we have shared none?
Sincerely,
Donna J. Bennett
aka General Mother Goose (it's an old nickname)
Director for
A Partnership for Peace (p4p)
Current events in Iran have focused world attention on the issue of fair elections and the role of international election monitors. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has taken a lead among intergovernmenmental organizations in training and providing international election monitors. The United Nations has done so only on an
ad hoc basis.
It would be useful for the United Nations to have an election-monitoring agency drawing upon the experience of the OSCE. With the attention on the Iranian experience, it should be possible to get a UN General Assembly resolution to create a study group to analyse the possibility of such an election-monitoring agency.
The first step is to contact national Foreign Ministries and national missions to the UN in New York with the proposal of such a study. During the summer months, preperations are being made by diplomats for the start of the UN General Assembly in September. As many of the ideas for such a UN agency are in my article, you could copy it with a short letter to national officials asking for such a study.
Thank you for your cooperation, Rene Wadlow
International Election Monitors:
Agents of Free Elections
Rene Wadlow*
The post-election demonstrations in Iran which have led to deaths and arrests indicate that a large number of Iranians believe that the election count has been the result of fraud. The regime had hoped to prevent a massive show of democratic stirring by a show of force and by cutting off means of communication — web sites and cellphones. However, the fact that hundreds of thousands came out on the avenues of Tehran and in less numbers in other cities indicates a failure of the repressive policies. Even if large protests do not continue, a ‘wind of change’ has blown over Iran.
The Iranian government had declined the offers of international monitoring of the elections, and thus the world community is left with only the word of the Iranian government that the election process was free and fair. The wide victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — 62.6 percent against some 34 percent for his main challenger, Mir Hussein Moussavi, goes against earlier opinion polls and an increasing popularity of Moussavi in the late stages of the election campaign. Mir Hussein Moussavi had been Prime Minister during the long and costly-in-life war with Iraq (1980-1988).
After four years of President Ahmadinejad’s weak economic policies as well as his confrontation with many other countries, many Iranians were looking for a change. For the elections, President Ahmadinejad tried to build his support in the rural areas with last moment rural development efforts which his opponents saw as transparent ‘bribes’. He had lost much support among educated Middle Class urban voters who wanted a better standard of living, employment opportunities for the young, and greater personal freedoms.
Thus, the election could have been close even if Ahmadinejad had won fairly, having the resources of the State at his control. Now, there is great scepticism concerning the outcome both in Iran and in the world community. The scepticism is so great that a promise by the Guide of the Iranian regime, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has been made concerning a recount in certain contested areas. However, electoral fraud is rarely at the counting stage. One can recount a stuffed ballot box and come up with the same number of votes. This is why the whole electoral process needs to be monitored by independent election agents.
Citizens of the World have often called for international, basically UN supervision, of elections. The organization of elections remains a prerogative of the national – administrative sub-divisions of the State, and local governments. However, in cases where the election campaign can be tense and prone to violence as was the presidential election of Zimbabwe, or when there has been a past history of fraud, international, independent monitors are important agents of fair elections and help to protect human rights, to strengthen the rule of law and to ensure pluralistic democracy.
Election observation work is an important activity for the 56 member States of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and its Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights housed in Warsaw, Poland. The Office for Democratic Institutions, originally called the Office for Free Elections, first played an important role in the democratic transition in post-communist countries. While its observation of elections is its most visible task, the Office also conducts a number of other useful election-related activities: reviewing electoral legislation, training observers, and publishing guidelines and handbooks about electoral issues.
The Office for Democratic Institutions is concerned with a wholistic approach to election monitoring including the following:
- Respect for basic fundamental freedoms such as the freedom of assembly, of association, and expression;
- Respect for the civil and political rights of the candidates and voters;
- Compilation of accurate voter lists;
- Equal opportunities to campaign in a free environment;
- Equitable access to the media;
- Impartial election administrative bodies;
- Unhindered access for international and domestic election observers;
- Effective representation and participation of women:
- Effective representation of national minorities;
- Access for disabled voters;
- Honest and transparent counting and tabulation of the votes;
- Effective complaints and appeals process with an independent judiciary.
The United Nations has no comparable permanent election monitoring office, but on an ad hoc basis the UN played an important monitoring role in the first multi-racial elections in South Africa, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has provided election aid and monitoring in countries such as Nepal as that country was coming out of a decade of armed violence.
The Iranian government would have been wise to request international monitoring for its presidential elections. Now it is too late. It is unlikely that a new election will be held to replace the contested one. The Iranian elections have indicated a wide current of support for change. The hesitations of the ruling circle concerning post-election manifestations have highlighted division of views within this ruling circle. The demonstrations have also indicated to the world community as a whole the need for independent election monitoring. Steps should be taken quickly for the UN to provide such services drawing on the rich experience of the OSCE.
*Rene Wadlow, Representative to the UN, Geneva, Association of World Citizens