Cross-posted from Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship: http://www.schwabfound.org/pdf/schwabfound/Governance_Social_Enterp...
Foreword
This document was conceived by social entrepreneurs for social entrepreneurs and those contemplating to start a social enterprise. Two years ago, a group of social entrepreneurs from the Schwab Foundation community came together to identify the issues on which they wished someone had provided guidance when they
were embarking on their social enterprise journey. In 2010, the first challenge they took was social investment. Many had struggled with questions such as if and how to raise capital from social investors, whether they should sign a non-disclosure agreement or not and simply which social investors to approach. The experience and questions of the Schwab Social Entrepreneurs were taken up in the first publication of the task force, called the Social Investment Manual.
Based on the success of the Social Investment Manual, Andreas Heinecke, Founder of Dialogue Social Enterprise, convened the task force during the World Economic Forum Meeting on Europe in Vienna in June 2011 to discuss the next logical step after social
investment. The task force identified Corporate Governance of Social Enterprises and, in particular, Boards. Many investors demand a change in governance structures as a result of investing in an organization. This requires social entrepreneurs to think about
creating a board if they do not already have one and managing it in an optimal way.
Boards bear the potential to greatly enhance the mission of a social enterprise, if careful thought goes into the right composition and management. Governing boards also have significant influence and can take social enterprises into different directions than intended by the founders. Many entrepreneurs of social businesses which generate attractive financial returns find over time that their boards might be tempted to choose higher profitability over deeper social impact. Overruled by investors’ priorities, many founders have left their organizations. Among others, this document addresses the
question of how social enterprise leaders can protect the social mission of their organization through the governance structure. While this is a manual by social entrepreneurs, it would not have been written without the crucial support of Professor Ann-Kristin Achleitner and Judith Mayer from the Technical University Munich. We are greatly thankful to Professor Achleitner for providing her deep expertise gathered over years as Chair of the Institute of Entrepreneurial Finance on governance in small and medium enterprises. We would like to thank Judith Mayer for her close collaboration with the social entrepreneurs of the task force through regular calls, interviews and a survey to compile this manual. We hope this manual will serve as a practical tool for social
entrepreneurs and will find its way into university courses. However, it is only as useful as you find it. We hope, therefore, to hear your feedback to incorporate into subsequent versions. Note: This is a “living document”. Please help us to strengthen it with your feedback and comments.
Hilde Schwab
Chair, Schwab
Foundation
for Social
Entrepreneurship
Mirjam Schöning
Head, Schwab
Foundation
for Social
Entrepreneurship
Click here to access the entire document: http://www.schwabfound.org/pdf/schwabfound/Governance_Social_Enterp...
Tags: social enterprise, social entrepreneur, social investment
Please consider Paying What You Can to help PCDN grow. We encourage you to consider any amount from $1 and up. Read the SUPPORT page prior to making a payment to see PCDN's impact and how your payment will help.
By using this site you're agreeing to the terms of use as outlined in the community guidelines (in particular PCDN is an open network indexed by Google and users should review the privacy options). Please note individual requests for funding or jobs are NOT permitted on the network.
Click BELOW to share site resources
or Share on LINKEDIN
FOLLOW PCDN on TWITTER, FACEBOOK or GOOGLE+
Celine Desbrosses liked Charlotte Booth's discussion Event: Great Lakes Policy Forum, Washington DC - Wednesday, May 29th -"Intervention Force and Stabilisation Plan in DRC: Compatible, or Counter-productive?" Johns Hopkins - SAIS 1740, Washington D.C.
Celine Desbrosses replied to Charlotte Booth's discussion Event: Great Lakes Policy Forum, Washington DC - Wednesday, May 29th -"Intervention Force and Stabilisation Plan in DRC: Compatible, or Counter-productive?" Johns Hopkins - SAIS 1740, Washington D.C.
osituyo oladapo liked Elizabeth Degi Mount's discussion Accounting and Social Media Intern, Center for the Study of Gender and Conflict© 2013 Created by Craig Zelizer.
