Peace and Collaborative Development Network

Building Bridges, Networks and Expertise Across Sectors

Greetings

I am currently in Doha, Qatar, teaching a summer course on conflict resolution and terrorism at the Georgetown University Campus in Education City.

As part of the course today, we watched Obama's speech from Cairo. The speech was broad ranging and Obama discussed several critical conflict areas that have been the source of much misunderstanding and tension between the "Muslim world" and the "West". These include, stereotyping and prejudice, the Israeli/Palestinian Conflict, extremists, lack of educational and economic opportunity and more.

One of Obama's central themes is that the world's diverse religions can and often do co-exist. The key is to engage in dialogue and difficult discussions on the topics where we often disagree with one another. There is a tremendous amount of work being done by religious leaders and members to promote inter-faith dialogue, understanding and interaction. While many of these activities are important stepping stones to facilitating change, dialogue in and of itself is often not enough. Creating understanding is only a first step, as there is the critical question of what will this new information do in terms of attitudinal and behavioral change.

I am curious what others think is the most critical aspect of making dialogue work successful?
What are some of the key resources that you find benefical related to dialogue (videos, training materials, etc.)?
What are some of your success stories related to dialogue? What are some of the challenges you have experienced?

Tags: change, inter-faith dialogue, obama, practice, religion

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

In short Craig, I agree with the statements about dialogue not being enough and of the particular difficulties with interfaith dialogue among disparate groups.

Briefly, I think a very large barrier in constructive dialogue among interfaith groups or among those in conflict revolving around identity issues is the lack of engagement with the very difficult underlying issues. That is, without surfacing and dealing with the very deep and lasting differences (and even antagonisms) present between the dialogue partners, what we end up with is a very surface agreement that is likely to fail at the moment these differences and antagonisms arise later.

In addition, many dialogue sessions are built around "What do we want to do, and how can we do it?" This lacks a certain motivational aspect: Why we are doing it. Without knowing and affirming why we are engaging each other and working toward change, we will often lose steam in the long run.

Reply to This

Hi Brandon
Thanks. Having been involved in dialogue work in a number of different areas, I agree in principle that exploring the core reasons for coming together and differences is critical. However, there is also a lot of dialogue work that unfortunately focuses on the why, but without proceeding to the what or how to change things. Obviously we need both, as understanding does not always generation action, but action without a underlying motivation and bond between groups and people does is not sustainable.

Reply to This

When we see the reactions of Muslims around the world they seem to be so positive and sincere towards President Obama's peace initiative. This shows they wanted peace but no body, actually, came to them rather many called them by the names as terrorists, extremists, Islamists etc. and tried to press their genuine demands by force.

Mr. Obama is perhaps first United Sates President to make a history of conquering Muslims' hearts, not the physical territories, by his acceptable attitude.

President Obama's speech, no doubt, is good beginning and not only Muslims but all the people who love peace and solidarity must welcome this gesture. However, there are tough challenges ahead to transform the words into action. The Israel-Palestine conflict where Israel has shown reluctance to change its settlement policy will remain the main obstacle to implement his vision. But there are many in Israel who support President Obama's idealogy. At the same time, there are circles in US, who will not easily understand President Obama's doctrine to bring peace in region. Among the Muslims, though most will welcome, many will not believe if Americans are really so sincere towards their welfare. A resistance could be expected.

Therefore, there is urgent need of creating conditions for peace to prevail. Bridging the gaps, perhaps by changing the attitude or mindset of all parties, will be first step in this direction. That can be achieved by brining all actors to one common platform based on the philosophy of social justice, mutual respect, understanding and co-existence. The long term remedy - is imparting peace and interfaith education through the religious and educational institutions all over world. A Peace Education curriculum should be developed perhaps under the aegis of United Nations, and implemented by all member states. What do you think??

Please also visit: www.peaceandtolerance.ning.com

Reply to This

Thanks. the UN already has been involved in many efforts on peacebuilding and peace education. In particular see UNESCO's Culture of Peace effort, http://www3.unesco.org/iycp/uk/uk_sommaire.htm

Reply to This

Thank you so much, Craig, for providing this useful information. But yet there is a lot to do to take this culture of peace to grass-root level. I will try to spread the word

Craig, it is great beginning when President of United Sates has come forward to work for peace and security in a different way. Unlike his predecessors, he has realized that the force multiplies the human sufferings and it is the dialogue that brings parties to the conflict to a common understanding. He is on right path we all have to co-operate him in delegating his approach - based on mutual respect and coexistence.

Reply to This

RSS

SHARE THIS PAGE WITH OTHERS

By using this site you're agreeing to the terms of use as outlined in the community guidelines. Please note individual requests for funding or jobs are NOT permitted on the network.

CLICK BELOW TO SHARE SITE RESOURCES (you can email pages, and post directly to FACEBOOK, TWITTER and RELATED SITES)


FOLLOW US DIRECTLY ON TWITTER OR FACEBOOK

Translation Tool

Latest Activity

Hassan Mohamed updated their profile
30 minutes ago
34 minutes ago
By way of visiting Kristin Famula’s page here at PCDN, I learned about the IIPE cooperative learning event in Colombia, and the IIPE group you started (here at PCDN).   I feel an affinity for the PCDN’s theme of “Building Bridges, Networks and Expe…
2 hours ago
Pascal Gemperli and Sarah are now friends
4 hours ago
Craig Zelizer added 9 discussions
4 hours ago
4 hours ago
ALAMZEB KHAN, Vivian de Mesquita, Oyvind Ree Ofstad and 5 more joined Peace and Collaborative Development Network
5 hours ago
H Jade Frank, Thank you for this opportunity, this is a special opportunity for me. how can i apply?
5 hours ago

Badge

Loading…

About

Craig Zelizer Craig Zelizer created this Ning Network.

© 2010   Created by Craig Zelizer

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!